US TAX COURT 

Julie Patriot                            )				  		 
	Petitioners,                     )      DOCKET # 10677-06	
     V.                                  )  	Amended Petition for Redetermination 
				         )	of a Notice of Deficiency			        		                                                          )
Commissioner Internal Revenue   	 )       
       Respondent
  1. Petitioner(s) hereby file her Amended Petition for Redetermination of a Deficiency (The 90 Day Letter). Petition was filed on or about May 30, 2006. The Answer by Respondent was filed on August 1, 2006.
  2. Petitioner(s) disagree(s) with the Determination contained in the Notice of Deficiency issued by the Internal Revenue Service issued for the year(s) or period(s) 2003, as set forth in such notice dated April 14, 2006.
  3. Taxpayer identification number is 224-62-4000.
  4. Petitioner(s) request(s) the following relief for the following reasons:
    1. The Petitioner requests the Notice of Deficiency be redetermined and her correct tax liability (if any) be determined.
    2. Petitioner denies she has any tax liability, and disputes the figures and the contents of the NOD above listed. Petitioner disagrees with the computations, statements and conclusions in the said 90 Day Letter.
    3. For the tax years in question, Petitioner had dependents, deductions, business expenses, credits, allowances, tax preparation/advice expenses, charitable donations, etc. Further the filing status in the NOD is incorrect.
    4. The 1099s and W-2 forms information and other statements of income on the NOD are incorrect, false, or appears that way to me. I do not have information to substantiate the income figures alleged by the IRS. The case is ready for settlement. I request a settlement conference with Appeals, etc.
    5. Petitioner requests waiver and abatement of all penalties. The Internal Revenue Code is so complex and confusing no one can understand it or comply with its multitudinous provisions.
  5. Petitioner requests that the case be conducted under the regular tax court procedures. Petitioner does NOT want her case conducted as a “small tax case” procedures. X 
     
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: I do hereby certify on this date that a copy this pleading was sent to properly to opposing council.
___________________________				Date: August 20, 2006
Dr. Julie Patriot, Petitioner Pro se
Bridgeport, West Virginia 26330