| Robert Clarkson 864-225-3061 email | Nelson Waller 864-225-0882 |
| Instructions: If the federal tax collectors harass you, send them this letter. This is a powerful act of Congress and the agency is greatly concerned. You need to personalize this draft letter before you submit it. However, this is only a preliminary draft letter and should not be used for a real purpose at this time. The real letter will be posted soon on the PN website under "Collections." Please confer with Dr. Clarkson before you make a final administrative claim. |
| Return Name and Address: Val Patriot Dated January 12, 2006 Area Director of IRS for this Region Re: ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM FOR UNAUTHORIZED COLLECTION ACTIONS UNDER IRS 7433 & 26 CFR 301.7433-1 Dear: Compliance Technical Support Manager: This is an administrative claim for civil damages for Unauthorized Collection Actions under IRC 7433 and CFR 301.7433-1. Under said law in section (d)(1) and said regulation in section (d)______, I am required to exhaust my administrative remedies. This letter is my method of doing that. I will file a civil action in US District Court under IRC 7433 for the wrongful and illegal collections actions against me. Under CFR 301.7433 (1) (d)________, I must inform you of the following: 1. My name and address is above. My telephone number and identification number are below. The best time to call me is____ ...during normal business hours..... 2. The grounds of my claim for damages include: 3. The injuries for this claim include: Also, we were unable to pay our bills, which resulted in huge interest incurred and penalty charges from the credit card companies, etc. 4. The dollar amount of the claim includes: In conclusion, this is my claim for damages for wrongful actions of IRS employees. Under federal law, I am entitled to compensation. Yours:
Signature:________________________________
Val Patriot
Telephone number: _________________________
SSN:____________________________________
|
| Marilyn Freeman Date: August 28, 2006 Area Director of IRS for this Region Re: ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM FOR UNAUTHORIZED COLLECTION ACTIONS UNDER IRS 7433 & 26 CFR 301.7433-1 Dear: Compliance Technical Support Manager: This is an administrative claim for civil damages for Unauthorized Collection Actions under IRC 7433 and CFR 301.7433-1. Under said law in section (d) (1) and said regulation in section (d), I am required to exhaust my administrative remedies. This letter is my method of doing that. I will file a civil action in US District Court under IRC 7433 for the wrongful and illegal collections actions against me. Under CFR 301.7433 (e) (2), I must inform you of the following: 1. My name and address is above. My telephone number and identification number are below. The best time to call me is during normal business hours. 2. The grounds of my claim for damages include:
3. The injuries for this claim include:
4. The dollar amount of the claim include:
In conclusion, this is my claim for damages for wrongful actions of IRS employees. Under federal law, I am entitled to compensation. Yours: Signature:_________________________________ Marilyn Freeman Telephone number: (864) 555-1234 SSN: 123-45-6789 |
95% of IRS Liens Issued IncorrectlyMonday July 3, 2006 Page G-8ISSN 1523-567X Tax, Budget & Accounting Tax Liens IRS Incorrectly Issued Liens in 95 Percent Of Cases Analyzed in Audit, TIGTA Says The Internal Revenue Service did not comply with federal laws and failed to follow its own internal guidelines when issuing lien notices based on an audit of federal tax liens analyzed between September 2005 and February 2006, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration concluded in a report released June 30. TIGTA said it reviewed a statistically valid sample of 150 notices of federal tax liens and determined IRS correctly mailed the lien notices to taxpayers in only seven cases, or 4.7 percent of the time. Additionally, IRS did not inform representatives of taxpayers that liens were filed against their clients in 75 percent of the sampled cases, the audit said. In addition, undelivered lien notices were not timely controlled by IRS's automated lien system, the TIGTA's report, dated June 21, said. In a June 2 response to a draft of the audit, IRS agreed to implement TIGTA recommendations to improve its lien processes and said it has made "significant procedural changes" to its lien program. In fiscal year 2001 IRS filed 426,166 liens, in FY 2005 it filed 544,316 liens, and in FY 2005 it filed 522,887 liens, the report said. Internal Revenue Code Section 6320, which outlines due process requirements associated with IRS issuing a Notice of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL) to a taxpayer, contains calendar deadlines by which IRS must deliver liens to taxpayers and includes what types of information must be included with the liens. The section also outlines a taxpayer's right to a fair hearing related to an imposed lien. 'No Improvement' Cited The June 21 audit was TIGTA's eighth annual audit to determine if IRS complied with code Section 6320 and IRS internal guidelines related to NFTLs. The report said in prior years TIGTA audits found IRS had not achieved full compliance with the law and its own internal guidelines. Despite IRS use of a new procedure of consolidated lien work at two IRS campuses in an effort to reduce the number of untimely issued notices, TIGTA said it "identified no improvement in the timeliness of mailing lien notices since our prior visit. ... This year's percentage of untimely mailed lien notices (4.67 percent) is the same as the percentage that we identified last year." Based on its latest findings that IRS mailed lien notices in a timely fashion only 4.67 percent of the time during its audit, TIGTA estimated in its report 23,825 lien notices prepared from Aug. 1, 2004, to July 31, 2005, could have been mailed late. The report said undelivered mail continued to be a problem. IRS management reports for the fourth quarter of FY 2005 and the first quarter of FY 2006 showed 108,764 lien notices were returned undelivered, the audit said. TIGTA recommended IRS's Small Business/Self-Employed Division consult with IRS's Office of Chief Counsel to identify any actions necessary to correct potential legal violations identified in the TIGTA report. IRS said in its June 2 response it has already completed that action. TIGTA also recommended IRS further automate specific processes associated with the lien program, a recommendation IRS said it will implement no later than Dec. 31. The report, Fiscal Year 2006 Statutory Review of Compliance With Lien Due Process Procedures (2006-30-094) is available on the Web at http://www.ustreas.gov/tigta/oa_auditreports_fy06.html . |
|
A Clarkson Report So, the stinking, rotten IRS has placed a tax lien on your real estate, or a levy on your paycheck. What can you do? Well, you have options. You can do one of several things. You need to read and study, then pick the best route for you. Order the materials you need from the book list. The tax collectors have many tricks, but they can be beaten with knowledge and determination. 1. What is a tax lien? A tax lien is a lien like a mortgage lien or a mechanic's lien, which is an encumbrance against real property that runs with the land, i.e. whoever purchases the land also takes the indebtedness. A lien is a claim or hold upon the real property of another as security for a debt that can he satisfied by the property or the sale of it. A lien attaches to all real estate of the debtor (even property acquired after the date filed) in the county where the lien was filed. A lien holder can foreclose on the property, i.e. put it up for auction and sale on the courthouse steps. 2. What is a federal tax lien? It is a lien against your real estate located in the county in whose courthouse the lien is filed. Regardless of the title or wording of the name of the IRS form used, once it is filed by the clerk of court, it is binding or notice to the world, for six to ten years. Tax liens only apply to real property. If you have none in the county where filed, the lien has no effect unless you buy or inherit some real property in that county. The lien does not cross county lines. Do not have false hopes due to the misleading words on the federal tax lien form. Once it is received by the clerk of court, it is accepted by the legal community. Also, a federal lien supersedes state law, so you have no protection, homestead or otherwise. 3. When a lien is filed against your house, nobody comes out there and places a large piece of paper across the roof of your home, hut rather a notice is recorded at the courthouse which warns all future buyers and lenders that a lien holder has a prior claim against the real estate owned by you in that county. Normally, prospective buyers of the property will not buy the property unless you pay off the lien and have it removed. Or, the buyer would pay you less than the full price and use the money due you to pay the lien holder. Lenders will not lend money on real estate when notified of a prior lien unless arrangements are made in advance to satisfy the prior encumbrances. 4. Liens and mortgages have a priority system whereby whichever one is filed first has the first claim against the real property and whoever is recorded second can only collect what is left over. Real estate law is explained well in Clarkson's Tax Collector's Manual However, the buyer or lender does not have to satisfy the lien. A family member could accept the house with all the liens on it. Deeds can still he drawn and filed as property can be sold or transferred with lien on record. Some purchasers will buy land with lien on record. However, the lien just sits there at the courthouse until it expires unless the tax thieves attempt to foreclose, i.e. sell your property at auction. However, if someone wishes to purchase your home, they could mandate satisfaction of the lien prior to purchase. Yet, if no auction or purchase takes place after six to ten years, the tax lien expires by the statute of limitations unless the tax collector renews the lien. However, such liens are rarely renewed. In 1990, the law was changed to allow the IRS ten years to renew a tax lien. Other liens such as mortgages, mechanic's liens etc. expire at varying times. The statue of limitations can be tolled or extended by several of your actions. However, this extension is not recorded in the deed room and is generally ineffective. 5. The usual procedure of the Instant Robbery Squad is to allow small liens to expire by the statute of limitations and to foreclose on the large ones. However, under the new IRS procedures, the tax thieves are ignoring almost everybody and almost all liens. Therefore, the best course of action today is to do nothing, unless the local IRS agent acts serious. If you receive a Notice of Seizure, Foreclosure or Auction, call Dr. Clarkson immediately. 6. Under the CDPH laws IRC §6320 and §6330, the Instant Robbery Squad cannot foreclose on a lien or use enforcement methods while the CDPH is pending. Therefore, always request your CDPH. You must do this timely and you must follow procedures. 7. Remove a lien? You can do several things, depending on the circumstances: 10. These levies, as most, are not continuous and do not apply again unless the IRS sends a new levy form. However, most financial institutions ignore this provision of the law. 11. Brokerage Accounts and Investment. The IRS can steal these easily, if they bother to. It may take the tax collectors a while to levy these, but once done, not much we can do. Actually, they frequently do not find brokerage accounts and almost never find other types of investments and receivables. D. Bankruptcy. You can file bankruptcy and immediately remove wage levies and in some cases make the IRS refund stolen pay. See Bankruptcy below. 14. Bankruptcy. You can now file bankruptcy on the IRS and wipe out the tax debts for your personal income tax, but not for withholding taxes on employees. 16. Plead poverty. You can negotiate with the tax collectors and persuade them to remove liens and levies due to hardship. This could be dangerous, so be careful. |
|
Jose S. Freeman Aug. 30, 2005 Social Security Administration
Dear Sir/ Madam: The Social Security Administration has removed from my retirement benefit check the amount of 15% under the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). This was sent to the IRS. This is a hardship for me. This check is all I have to live on. I do not have any other income or monies. My health is failing me since my surgery and at present I still have to see a doctor to advice me about a cataract in my right eye. I request that the 15% offset be waived and/or removed due to hardship, this check is all I have to live on. Yours, |
|
NFTL--Throwing-off Oppressive Government via Credit Reporting Agency Blocking and Dispute by Sovereign Dave The “Notice of Federal Tax Lien” is a particular annoying governmental nuisance to the People. By essentially collusion with the states the federal government attempts collection through intimidation and law for government errantly applied to the people. Only government can slaughter the people and their rights on a whole-scale basis through forms and computers. In this regard the NFTL has become a “Weapon of Mass Distraction” as the IRS uses computers to deliver this weapon of deception. Most people encounter this silent weapon when they attempt to apply for credit. A credit reporting agency (CRA) will report this as “negative information” in the public records section of a consumer credit report; your loan will thusly be denied based on this adverse information. Fortunately there are only 3 credit reporting agencies and while the IRS has tried to shut the door on freedom, the FTC has opened the window. (FYI: All dispute addresses for the CRA”s are included on the cover letter.) A Window in Disguise Identity theft has become a problem of enormous proportion. According to estimates once every 79 seconds someone becomes the victim of identity theft. Here is a reference that claims victims of identity theft conveniently include “bogus IRS” letters: Known Identity Theft Scams
In recent years, identity thieves have been very creative in the methods they have used to obtain their victims' personal information. Some methods have become well known to government authorities. Included below is a brief listing of some of the known identity theft scams. For an up to date listing of known identity theft scams, see the FTC's Identity Theft Scams webpage. |
|
Mary Patriot
August 1, 2006
Tax Payer's Advocate Dear Tax Advocate, I have been audited by the IRS even though everyone knows I don't owe them a penny and they are taking money from my Social Security check. They have refused to assist me and to remove the lean even though I have told them this causes a hardship for me. I am 78 years old and living in a senior care facility. Due to my age and infirmities, I am not able to withstand a complete tax audit and related legal matters. I receive Social Security which is not taxable. However the IRS is attempting to penalize me for not filing. The tax agency is strictly interested in harassing me. I need your help. Would you please contact the IRS on my behalf, and ask them to figure my taxes correctly and then leave me alone. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely,
Mary Patriot |
| Henry Patriot Date: November 22, 2005 Senator Jim DeMint To the Honorable Jim DeMint, I am being brutalized by the IRS. Due to my age and infirmities, I am not able to withstand a complete tax audit and related legal matters. I have been audited by the IRS for two years even though everyone knows I don’t owe them a penny. Due to my age I am not able to stand up to them any more. I am retired; I receive Social Security which is not taxable. I receive a small pension from my long-term employer. The amount of the pension is less than the threshold amount for me to file. However the IRS is attempting to penalize me for not filing. I am over 65 and my wife is over 65 and in a nursing home. I am entitled to four deductions. In order for me to file income tax forms, I would need taxable income of over 19,000 dollars. I don’t come anywhere close to that. Any IRS agent can look and instantly see that I do not owe any income tax. I did not file an income tax form for those years because I did not make enough money according to IRS instructions in order to file. I have repeatedly asked the IRS to give me the credit for myself and my wife and figure the taxes for me to sign. They have refused to settle this case. The tax agency is strictly interested in harassing me. I need your help. Would you please contact the IRS on my behalf, and ask them to figure my taxes correctly and then leave me alone. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, _____________ Henry Patriot |
New rules for Offer in CompromiseIRS's revised offer in compromise form package reflects tough new TIPRA rules IR 2007-50; Fact Sheet 2007-16 IRS has released the newly revised taxpayer application for an offer in compromise, the Form 656 package. In an information release and fact sheet, IRS highlights how the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA, P.L. 109-222) has changed the way IRS's offer in compromise (OIC) program operates, effective July 16, 2006. Background: IRS may compromise tax liabilities on doubt as to collectibility; doubt as to liability; economic hardship; and extraordinary events beyond the taxpayer's control. ( Reg. 301.7122-1(b) ) To make an offer, a taxpayer files Form 656, Offer in Compromise, and, except for offers based solely on doubt as to liability, Form 433-A, Collection Information Statement for Individuals, or Form 433-B, Collection Information Statement for Businesses. A $150 processing fee generally applies. TIPRA 509 made major changes to the IRS OIC program. These changes affect all offers received by IRS on or after July 16, 2006 (regardless of the postmark date on the offer). The new TIPRA rules: * requires any lump-sum OIC (i.e., any offer of payment made in fiveor fewer installments) to be accompanied by the payment of 20% of the amount of the offer. (Code Sec.7122(c)(1)(A)) * requires any periodic payment OIC to be accompanied by the payment of the amount of the first proposed installment. (Code Sec.7122(c)(1)(B)(i)) Any failure to make an installment (other than the first installment) due under a periodic payment OIC while the offer is being evaluated by IRS may be treated as a withdrawal of the offer.(Code Sec. 7122(c)(1)(B)(ii)) * provides that any OIC that isn't accompanied by the required payment may be returned to the taxpayer as unprocessable. (Code Sec.7122(d)(3)(C)) * allows the taxpayer to specify the application of any payment made under the above rules to the assessed tax or to other amounts (i.e.,penalties or interest) imposed with respect to that tax. (Code Sec.7122(c)(2)(A)) * treats an OIC as deemed accepted if IRS doesn't reject it within 24 months after it is submitted. (Code Sec. 7122(f)) * provides that any assessed tax or other amounts (i.e., interest or penalties) imposed with respect to a tax which is the subject of an OIC subject to the above rules will be reduced by any user fee imposed for the offer. (Code Sec. 7122(c)(2)(B)) * allows IRS to issue regs waiving any payment required under Code Sec. 7122(c)(1), consistent with the practices established in accordance with the Code Sec. 7122(d)(3) requirements. (Code Sec.7122(c)(2)(C)) New details on new rules. In IR 2007-50 and Fact Sheet 2007-16, IRS highlights some of the major changes in its procedural and submission rules as a result of the TIPRA changes:* Lump sum cash offer. Twenty percent of the total amount of the offer must be paid with the Form 656. If the installments will be paid in five months or less, the taxpayer should offer the "realizable value" of his assets, the amount that a taxpayer could reasonably expect from the sale of an asset if sold quickly, typically in 90 days or less (the quick sale value) minus what the taxpayer owes a secured creditor, plus the total that could be collected over 48 months of payments (or the remainder of the statutory period for collection,whichever is less). If the installment payments will be paid in more than five months, the taxpayer should offer the realizable value of his assets plus the total that could be collected over 60 months of payments (or the remainder of the statutory period for collection,whichever is less). * Short term periodic payment offer. The offer amount must be paid within six to 24 months from the date IRS receives Form 656. The offer amount must reflect the taxpayer's realizable value of assets plus the amount that could be collected over 60 months of payments (or the remainder of the statutory period of collection, whichever is less). Failure to make the periodic payments during the offer investigation will cause the offer to be treated as withdrawn. * Deferred periodic payment offer. The amount must be paid over the remaining statutory period for collecting the tax. As with the short term periodic payment offer, the taxpayer must submit the first payment along with Form 656, and must continue to make regular payments during the offer investigation. The offer amount must reflect the taxpayer's realizable value on assets, plus the amount that could be collected through monthly payments during the remaining life of the collection statute. Failure to make the periodic payments during the offer investigation will cause the offer to be treated as withdrawn. * Designating payments. Taxpayers may designate in writing how IRS should apply the payments made while the offer is under investigation by specifying how the payments are to be applied to specific tax years or periods and to the type of tax. Without a written designation request, IRS will apply the payments in the best interest of the government. The $150 application fee cannot be designated by the taxpayer. * Payment of tax. All offer payments are considered "payments on tax" and are not refundable regardless of whether IRS declares the offer not processable or later returns, rejects, withdraws, or terminates the offer as a result of its investigation. When this happens, IRS will apply the payments to the taxpayer's outstanding liability. * Installment payment plans. A taxpayer who has an approved installment agreement payment plan with IRS and is making payments under this plan may stop remitting the installment payments at the time that a short term or deferred periodic payment offer (but not a lump sum cash offer) is filed. If it not accepted, the installment agreement payments must continue. * Low-income taxpayers. New guidelines apply for defining a low-income taxpayer in determining the exception to application fee and the initial payment requirement. Effective with the revision of Form 656, a low-income taxpayer is one whose income falls at or below 25% of the 2006 HHS Poverty Guidelines. A new worksheet is also provided to help taxpayers determine if they're eligible for the low-income waiver. Taxpayers claiming the low-income exception must complete Form 656 and attach Form 656-A (renamed Income Certificationfor Offer in Compromise Application Fee and Payment) and the worksheet. * Doubt as to liability offer. A taxpayer wishing to file a doubt as to liability offer must complete Form 656-L, Offer in Compromise (Doubt as to Liability), when claiming that all or part of the assessed tax liability is incorrect. * Payment voucher. A new Form 656-PPV, Offer in Compromise Periodic Payment Voucher, must be used by taxpayers to remit the required short term or deferred periodic payments to IRS while the offer is under investigation. RIA Research References: For offers in compromise, see FTC 2d/FIN T-9601 et seq.; United States Tax Reporter 71,224.01; TaxDesk 842,001; TG 70357.Source: Federal Taxes Weekly Alert (preview) 03/08/2007, Volume 53, No.10 |
| ... Neither the documents nor the heritage were to be found. Initially, I found this curious. Later, I found it alarming. At the IRS National Headquarters, there seemed little connection between the work of employees and actual tax collection--what I presumed to be the mission of the IRS. -- Shelley Davis before the Senate Finance Committee. (See full testimony.) |
For technical problems or broken links e-mail PN Webmaster