L.T. Patriot
C/O
May 5, 2007
Internal Revenue Service
Attn: Settlement Officer Janice Bankston,
RE: CDPH Request for Tax Years 2003-2004
Dear Janice Bankston,
You sent your letter dated April 26, 2007 (attached) concerning the Collection Due Process (CDP) Hearing. In response to your letter, I do not wish to have a correspondence conference nor do I wish to discuss this matter by telephone because your agency has a bad reputation.
I requested a face-to-face hearing as I am entitled to under the, law. The positions I will discuss include procedural irregularities, liability for penalties, etc. plus collection alternatives, including Offer in Compromise, payment schedule, hardship and temporary suspension of collection. Please send me the necessary forms to affect this, including the financial statement form.
Your said letter accuses me of raising issues in my CDPH Request that are “frivolous.” This is not true. Nothing in my CDPH request has been classified as frivolous or groundless. You stated that I asked the Appeals Department to “consider irrelevant issues, such as moral, religious, political, Constitutional, conscientious or similar grounds.” Your accusations are false.
Your false accusations are harassment and I request you to withdraw them. If I have made any such positions, I hereby withdraw them.
The burden of proof in all cases of application of frivolous penalties is on the Secretary. Everything in my CDPH request was according to IRC.
What I am requesting is an in-person meeting as prescribed by law. IRC Section 6330 (b) states:
“Right to a fair hearing
if the person requests a hearing under subsection (a)(3)(B), such hearing shall be held by the Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals.”
Nowhere in Section 6330 is there a provision for a telephone conference or correspondence by mail. The law is very clear that “such hearing shall be held by the Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals.” So I will reiterate my demand for a right to a fair hearing as prescribed by law.
At the hearing, I intend to raise any relevant issue relating to the unpaid tax or the proposed levy, including “challenges to the appropriateness of collection actions”; and “offers of collection alternatives” as set forth in Section 6330(c)(2).
At the hearing I will raise all issues provided for in IRC Section 6330(c)(2) as follows:
(2) Issues at hearing
(A) In general
The person may raise at the
hearing any relevant issue relating to the unpaid tax or the proposed levy,
including -
(i) appropriate spousal defenses;
(ii)challenges to the appropriateness of
collection actions; and
(iii) offers of collection alternatives,
which may include the posting of a bond, the substitution of other assets, an
installment agreement, or an offer-in-compromise.
(B) Underlying liability
The person may also raise at the
hearing challenges to the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability
for any tax period if the person did not receive any statutory notice of
deficiency for such tax liability or did not otherwise have an opportunity to
dispute such tax liability.
Other issues to be discussed at hearing:
My requests for CDPH includes these particulars:
My questions about your letter pertaining to my CDPH request:
Yours,
___________________
L. T. Patriot