May 11, 2007
Internal Revenue Service
Attn: Wayne Robson
Re: AP:FW:RIV:WDR
Identification Number : 000-00-0000
Dear Sir:
I am entitled to a Face
to Face Hearing. My attorney says
so, too.
Where do you get your authority to not allow me an
opportunity to have a face to face hearing?
I am entitled to a hearing. Congress passed a law, please obey it.
Your letter states false accusations. Please take the time to re-read my CDPH
request,( total of 3 pages ). I have not brought up any “moral, religious,
political, constitutional, conscientious or similar grounds.” There are no
frivolous arguments.
Also your tone of voice on the phone today was harassing in
nature. I feel I am being harassed. This
is against the law.
Please Sir, it would be in the interest of fairness and
impartiality if you would excuse yourself from this case and to appoint another
person. You are not listening to my concerns; you are not being courteous and
professional, and finally are not being fair and impartial. On the other side,
I have stated I would consider correspondence. You would not even allow me two
extra days to get my papers together to correspond. I am willing to tell you
when and how I think my case should be resolved, but you will not permit me to
have a face to face hearing.
For your reference, the tax court has ruled in three cases
that I am entitled to a face to face hearing if I request one, and I have so
requested. See Nelson vs. CIR, Docket
# 13212-05L on
Nov. 7, 2005; Shell vs. CIR #20188-05L on May 31,2006; Marett vs.
DIR, # 4048-05L dated July 7, 2006.
I will be waiting to
hear from your supervisor.
Sincerely,
Will Patriot
Cc: cdph request,
total of 3 pages.