IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FT. MYERS DIVISION

_________________________

SHERI PATRIOT,                     )
        Petitioner pro se          )        Case No. ________________________
                                   )
            vs.                    )        Notice of Petitioner’s Compliance
                                   )         
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,          )        with July 17th, 2007 Order, signed
AMSOUTH BANK,                      )         
        Respondents                )        by Douglas N. Frazier, United States
                                   )   
______________________________     )        Magistrate Judge
 
 
   COME NOW Petitioner, pro se, Sheri Patriot, states and alleges as
follows:
1    Although, Petitioner believes everyone should be accountable for their mistakes,
due to current statutes giving IRS agents immunity, Petitioner is not permitted to
proceed against Susan Stonier in this case.  Therefore, Petitioner agrees to remove
Susan Stonier as a Respondent in this case. 
 
2.   Petitioner will proceed against AmSouth Bank and Regions Financial Corporation 
      as successors to AmSouth Bank, in this case.   As the July 17th  Order stated,  
      “AmSouth Bank has not filed any documents in this case”.   In this regard, it is very 
      clear that in more than two years, the legal department of this bank chose never to 
      ‘make an appearance’ before this Court.  
 
     At this time, Petitioner moves this Court enter a default order against this Respondent. 
     There is no question, this Respondent’s negligent actions were part of the proximate 
     cause for this entire fiasco.   The bank has no defense and simply disregarding the 
     Court by never making an appearance does not make their part in the case ‘go away’.  
     As a result of this bank’s negligence, and arrogant disregard for this particular case 
     and this Court, Petitioner moves this bank be sanctioned and ordered to pay all 
     Petitioner’s expenses relating to this particular case as a small relief to the
 Petitioner.   
     Petitioner will provide a list of expenses for this case, beginning with the Petition to 
     Quash filed May 23, 2005; throughout the appeal process with the 11th Circuit Court  
     getting this case remanding February 22, 2007; throughout the future evidentiary 
     hearing, and obtaining a final order signed by a District Court Judge.  If this case 
     should need to be appealed again, this bank should bear the cost of that (potential) 
     appeal to the 11th Circuit Court, as well.  
 
Petitioner thanks this Court for the length of time granted for discovery.  
 
                                      By:_____________________________________
                                      Sheri Patriot, Petitioner, pro se                     
                                      Cape Coral , FL   33904