Robert Freeman                        ) 
                  Petitioner          ) 
       v.                             )     Docket No. 21xx-10
Commissioner Of Internal Revenue      )     Response to Respondent’s Motion To
                  Respondent          )     Vacate Deemed Admitted Admissions 
                                      ) 

Petitioner hereby responds to Respondents Motion to Vacate Deemed Admitted Admissions as is required by this courts Order dated September 22, 2010.

Petitioner has no objections to respondent’s motion and further states the following:

1. Petitioner is a pro se litigant and apparently has misinterpreted Rule 90(a) to seek Admissions through informal consultation or communication. Petitioner thought that he was expected to file a formal request for Admissions with this court.

2. Petitioner also, being a pro se litigant, was not aware he was supposed to copy the lawyer and the court on all communications. The green cards or return receipts from petitioners mailing were actually for documents that were sent to the court and not the IRS attorney.

3. Petitioner has sought knowledgeable assistance to further aid him with his court case and asks this court and the attorneys involved to have patience on procedure and any other irregularities that would not ultimately affect the outcome of this case as is referenced in the court case titled Haines vs. Kerner 404US 519(1972).

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: I certify that a copy of this foregoing Request

for Production of Documents was sent properly to James R. Bamberg, Area Counsel 400 West Bay Street, Room 240, Stop C, Jacksonville, FL 32202.

____________________________________                Date:  October 12, 2010
Robert Freeman, pro se 
123 Main St.
Freedom, SC 12345