UNITED STATES TAX COURT
WASHINGTON, DC
Christopher Freeman )
Petitioner, )
)
v. ) Docket No. 27xxx-07
)
Commissioner of IR, )
Respondent, )
___________________________________)
Motion to Compel Answers to Admissions
Petitioner hereby files his Motion to Compel Answers to Admissions based on the following reasons:
1. Petitioner filed Request for Admissions to the Commissioner September 22nd ,2008 and it was sent back from the clerk of court for whatever reason. Petitioner filed another Request for Admissions to the Commissioner on October 14th ,2008. District Counsel states that I did not file a Request for Admissions to the Commissioner and therefore will not Comply.
2. District Counsel also states that I did not file A Request for Admissions to the Commissioner within 45 days of the date the case is set to be called for trial. This is incorrect. Tax Court records should prove that I did indeed attempt to file the Request for Admissions to the Commissioner on September 22nd , 2008 and that Tax Court received it September 29th ,2008, although clerk of court sent it back in which I filed another Request for Admissions to the Commissioner promptly afterwards.
3. District Counsel also states that T.C. rule 90, states that the Request for Admissions should be filed with the court no later than 45 days prior to the date the case is set to be called for trial. The petitioner has looked at T.C. rule 90 on the Unites States Tax Court’s website and found no such time frame in the T.C rule 90. District Counsel a skilled Tax attorney is stalling and trying to confuse a pro se litigate who has no legal training or experience.
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on this date I sent properly a copy to opposing counsel.
_________________________ Date: October 23rd, 2008
Christopher Freeman, Pro se
Fort Myers, FL 33913