US TAX COURT 

Julie Freeman                    ) 
             Petitioners,        )      DOCKET # 197xxx
      v.                         )
                                 )
Commissioner Internal Revenue    )       Objection to Respondent’s
                                 )       Status Report
             Respondent,         )

Petitioner objects to the Status Report of Respondent dated December 8, 2006 based on the following grounds:

  1. The Court’s Order of September 11, 2006 gave Petitioner until Dec 11, 2006 to file all documents identifying or substantiating deductions. Petitioner did this by overnight mail and received the return receipt from the postal service showing that District Counsel’s secretary signed for the package on Dec 11, 2006.

  2. Petitioner sent the complete accounting records of her business showing in detail all income and business expenses. Taxpayer is in full compliance with the Judge’s said Order.

  3. District Counsel anticipated Petitioner filing her documentation with him by three days and therefore the Status Report of the Commissioner is premature and not correct.

  4. However this does not matter because now District Counsel has found or located Freeman’s missing tax return for her S-Corporation. In Note 1 of said Status Report at the bottom of page 2, District Counsel now admits that Petitioner’s S-Corporation was in existence for years, recognized by the IRS and in full compliance with all laws.

  5. Now that the S-Corporation returns have been filed, this entire matter is over with. The S-Corporation in this case is merely a pass through entity with no separate existence or tax position than Petitioner herself. Therefore the tax return for the pass through entity is the same as Freeman’s.

  6. Since the S-Corporation has now been accepted, nothing else remains for Freeman to do. Nor does she need to submit any documentation. However if this court feels that Petitioner should submit more documentation she will gladly do so.

  7. District Counsel should be admonished for not reporting to the taxpayer immediately after he had discovered the missing documentation in the IRS files, which incidentally Freeman mailed duplicates to him months ago. By failing to notify taxpayer that the critical issues had been resolved, taxpayer was put to great additional expense and time for a problem that does not exist anymore.

______________________________Date: January 10, 2007
Dr. Julie Freeman, Petitioner Pro se
1776 Patriot Way
Bridgeport, USA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing paper was served on Senior Attorney Terry Serena by mailing the same on September 30, 2006 in a postage-paid wrapper addressed to:

Terry Serena, Senior Attorney
312 Elm Street, Suite 2300
Cincinnati, OH 45202-2723.

_____________________Date: ______________________
Julie Freeman